Report was filled by:
Institut Callípolis, Spain
Triskelion, Norway
Asociacija „Kūrybinės ateities idėjos“ (KAI), Lithuania
Araxa Edu - Turkey
Demetrius, Romania
RIC, Latvia
Educom+, Greece
Total: 13 participants
Participants were asked evaluate project WP2 implementation a scale of 1 (Least desirable result possible) to 5 (Ideal expected result):
Evaluation results:
Implementation
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Clear understanding of the WP2 goals | 61 | 93,85 |
| Clear understanding of the WP2 activities | 61 | 93,85 |
| Clear understanding of the WP2 results | 61 | 93,85 |
| Perceived usefulness of the WP2 results | 61 | 93,85 |
| Sustainability potential of project results | 60 | 92,31 |
| How satisfied were you with the results of the implemented work package? | 60 | 92,31 |
92,31
TARGET GROUPS [
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Active involvement of target groups in project activities | 61 | 93,85 |
| WP2 results relevance to the beneficiaries | 63 | 96,92 |
FINANCIAL ASPECTS
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Alignment of the expenses with the WP2 specifications | 61 | 93,85 |
| Adequacy of the operational expenses | 61 | 93,85 |
COMMUNICATION
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Communication between partners (is it sufficient for an efficient work? | 62 | 95,38 |
| Communication with stakeholders | 60 | 92,31 |
PROJECT MEETINGS
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Usefulness of project meetings | 63 | 96,92 |
| Sufficient number of online meetings | 63 | 96,92 |
| Sufficient time for discussions during meetings | 62 | 95,38 |
DISSEMINATION
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Clearness of Dissemination and Exploitation Plan | 62 | 95,38 |
| Usefulness and suitability of project’s website | 63 | 96,92 |
| Ability of partnership to engage with external stakeholders | 59 | 90,77 |
EVALUATION
| INDICATOR | Points | % |
|---|
| Clearness of Evaluation Plan | 61 | 93,85 |
| Delivery of quality and evaluation tasks | 61 | 93,85 |
| Easiness of evaluation and quality assurance questionnaires | 61 | 93,85 |
| Usefulness of the reports on quality | 60 | 92,31 |
Comments, suggestions